CT.gov Phase Reporting Gap
2026-03-29 | full-registry ct.gov audit | plots, figures, and e156 bundle
Series
Phase Dashboard

Phase matters: early studies go quiet most often

The phase gradient shows that non-disclosure is not just sponsor-specific. Phase I is worst on rate, while the NA bucket dominates by scale.

Phase I rate
NA stock
Later phases
Eligible 2-year gap

Dashboard

The phase gradient shows that silence is not only sponsor-specific. It also varies along the development pathway itself.

How to read the dashboard
Interventional
441,191
All phase-labelled studies
Eligible older
249,507
2-year denominator
Phase I rate
76.7%
Highest phase-specific rate
NA stock
96,605
Largest unresolved block
Rates
PHASE RATEEligible 2-year no-results rate by phase labelPHASE176.7%NA65.5%EARLY_PHASE164.3%PHASE2 | PHASE353.4%PHASE452.4%PHASE1 | PHASE246.8%PHASE345.5%PHASE245.0%
Phase I is the quietest major phase on a rate basis, with early phase I and NA also notably opaque.
Rates show where missing results look routine within a phase rather than where the biggest raw backlog happens to sit.
Stock
PHASE STOCKAbsolute 2-year no-results counts by phase labelNA96,605PHASE126,959PHASE219,843PHASE414,162PHASE313,621PHASE1 | PHASE24,968PHASE2 | PHASE32,897EARLY_PHASE12,413
The NA bucket overwhelms all later phases on raw unresolved stock because of its size.
The NA category matters because sheer volume can turn a middling or even moderate rate into the single largest public stock of unresolved studies.
Read Across Projects

Across The Series

Each project isolates a different dimension of registry opacity, but the point is the contrast between them, not a single leaderboard.